# Conversation Summarization DeerFlow includes automatic conversation summarization to handle long conversations that approach model token limits. When enabled, the system automatically condenses older messages while preserving recent context. ## Overview The summarization feature uses DeerFlow's `DeerFlowSummarizationMiddleware` (a subclass of LangChain's `SummarizationMiddleware`) to monitor conversation history and trigger summarization based on configurable thresholds. When activated, it: 1. Monitors message token counts in real-time 2. Triggers summarization when thresholds are met 3. Keeps recent messages intact while summarizing older exchanges 4. Maintains AI/Tool message pairs together for context continuity 5. Substitutes the summary for the older messages **in the model request only** ### Non-destructive (display-preserving) compression > **Important:** DeerFlow compresses **transiently**, not destructively. LangChain's stock `SummarizationMiddleware` runs in `before_model` and persists a `RemoveMessage(REMOVE_ALL_MESSAGES)` to the checkpoint — which permanently deletes the original Q&A from both the model context *and* the conversation the frontend renders. DeerFlow overrides this: - `before_model` / `abefore_model` are **no-ops** (the destructive path is disabled). - Compression runs in `wrap_model_call` / `awrap_model_call`: for a single model call, the message list is replaced with `[summary, *recent]` via `request.override(messages=...)`. **Nothing is written back to state.** - The full original messages stay in the checkpoint, so the frontend keeps showing the user's real conversation. The summary message is named `summary` and flagged `hide_from_ui`, and because it only ever lives in the transient request it never reaches the frontend at all. - The generated summary is cached **per-thread** so we don't pay an extra LLM call on every model invocation. The cached summary is reused (no LLM call) until enough *new* messages accumulate to push the compressed context back over the trigger threshold (a sticky boundary mirroring the stock middleware's post-compaction behavior). The cache is bounded (oldest threads evicted first). - **Threshold-first**: while the full current conversation is still under the trigger, the request is passed through untouched — no cache lookup, no summary substitution. Compression only ever engages once the real context crosses the configured trigger. - **Stickiness headroom**: after `keep` picks a cutoff, the kept window is forced below ~75% of *every* trigger before summarizing (`_apply_stickiness_headroom`). This prevents the every-turn re-compaction that happens when `keep` is in *messages* (e.g. 20) but a trigger is in *tokens* (e.g. 60000) and the recent messages are large — without headroom the "compressed" context would still sit over the trigger and re-summarize on every follow-up question. - When the genuine (blocking) summarize path actually runs an LLM call, the middleware emits a `{"type":"context_compacting","message":"正在压缩上下文…"}` event on LangGraph's `custom` stream channel so the chat UI can show a transient "正在压缩" toast (the cheap cache-reuse path stays silent). Frontend handler: `onCustomEvent` in `frontend-web/src/core/threads/hooks.ts`. > **Legacy threads:** conversations compacted by an older (destructive) build already lost their original messages and carry a persisted `summary` message. The frontend hides any `name: "summary"` message, so the stray summary bubble no longer shows — but those already-discarded messages cannot be recovered. ## Configuration Summarization is configured in `config.yaml` under the `summarization` key: ```yaml summarization: enabled: true model_name: null # Use default model or specify a lightweight model # Trigger conditions (OR logic - any condition triggers summarization) trigger: - type: tokens value: 4000 # Additional triggers (optional) # - type: messages # value: 50 # - type: fraction # value: 0.8 # 80% of model's max input tokens # Context retention policy keep: type: messages value: 20 # Token trimming for summarization call trim_tokens_to_summarize: 4000 # Custom summary prompt (optional) summary_prompt: null # Tool names treated as skill file reads for skill rescue skill_file_read_tool_names: - read_file - read - view - cat ``` ### Configuration Options #### `enabled` - **Type**: Boolean - **Default**: `false` - **Description**: Enable or disable automatic summarization #### `model_name` - **Type**: String or null - **Default**: `null` (uses default model) - **Description**: Model to use for generating summaries. Recommended to use a lightweight, cost-effective model like `gpt-4o-mini` or equivalent. #### `trigger` - **Type**: Single `ContextSize` or list of `ContextSize` objects - **Required**: At least one trigger must be specified when enabled - **Description**: Thresholds that trigger summarization. Uses OR logic - summarization runs when ANY threshold is met. **ContextSize Types:** 1. **Token-based trigger**: Activates when token count reaches the specified value ```yaml trigger: type: tokens value: 4000 ``` 2. **Message-based trigger**: Activates when message count reaches the specified value ```yaml trigger: type: messages value: 50 ``` 3. **Fraction-based trigger**: Activates when token usage reaches a percentage of the model's maximum input tokens ```yaml trigger: type: fraction value: 0.8 # 80% of max input tokens ``` **Multiple Triggers:** ```yaml trigger: - type: tokens value: 4000 - type: messages value: 50 ``` #### `keep` - **Type**: `ContextSize` object - **Default**: `{type: messages, value: 20}` - **Description**: Specifies how much recent conversation history to preserve after summarization. **Examples:** ```yaml # Keep most recent 20 messages keep: type: messages value: 20 # Keep most recent 3000 tokens keep: type: tokens value: 3000 # Keep most recent 30% of model's max input tokens keep: type: fraction value: 0.3 ``` #### `trim_tokens_to_summarize` - **Type**: Integer or null - **Default**: `4000` - **Description**: Maximum tokens to include when preparing messages for the summarization call itself. Set to `null` to skip trimming (not recommended for very long conversations). #### `summary_prompt` - **Type**: String or null - **Default**: `null` (uses LangChain's default prompt) - **Description**: Custom prompt template for generating summaries. The prompt should guide the model to extract the most important context. #### `preserve_recent_skill_count` - **Type**: Integer (≥ 0) - **Default**: `5` - **Description**: Number of most-recently-loaded skill files (tool results whose tool name is in `skill_file_read_tool_names` and whose target path is under `skills.container_path`, e.g. `/mnt/skills/...`) that are rescued from summarization. Prevents the agent from losing skill instructions after compression. Set to `0` to disable skill rescue entirely. #### `preserve_recent_skill_tokens` - **Type**: Integer (≥ 0) - **Default**: `25000` - **Description**: Total token budget reserved for rescued skill reads. Once this budget is exhausted, older skill bundles are allowed to be summarized. #### `preserve_recent_skill_tokens_per_skill` - **Type**: Integer (≥ 0) - **Default**: `5000` - **Description**: Per-skill token cap. Any individual skill read whose tool result exceeds this size is not rescued (it falls through to the summarizer like ordinary content). #### `skill_file_read_tool_names` - **Type**: List of strings - **Default**: `["read_file", "read", "view", "cat"]` - **Description**: Tool names treated as skill file reads during summarization rescue. A tool call is only eligible for skill rescue when its name appears in this list and its target path is under `skills.container_path`. **Default Prompt Behavior:** The default LangChain prompt instructs the model to: - Extract highest quality/most relevant context - Focus on information critical to the overall goal - Avoid repeating completed actions - Return only the extracted context ## How It Works ### Summarization Flow 1. **Monitoring**: Before each model call, the middleware counts tokens in the message history 2. **Trigger Check**: If any configured threshold is met, summarization is triggered 3. **Message Partitioning**: Messages are split into: - Messages to summarize (older messages beyond the `keep` threshold) - Messages to preserve (recent messages within the `keep` threshold) 4. **Summary Generation**: The model generates a concise summary of the older messages 5. **Context Replacement (transient)**: The message list **handed to the model for this call** is rebuilt as `[summary, *recent]`. The persisted state is left untouched — old messages are **not** removed, so the frontend still renders the full original conversation. 6. **AI/Tool Pair Protection**: The system ensures AI messages and their corresponding tool messages stay together 7. **Skill Rescue**: Before the summary is generated, the most recently loaded skill files (tool results whose tool name is in `skill_file_read_tool_names` and whose target path is under `skills.container_path`) are lifted out of the summarization set and prepended to the preserved tail. Selection walks newest-first under three budgets: `preserve_recent_skill_count`, `preserve_recent_skill_tokens`, and `preserve_recent_skill_tokens_per_skill`. The triggering AIMessage and all of its paired ToolMessages move together so tool_call ↔ tool_result pairing stays intact. ### Token Counting - Uses approximate token counting based on character count - For Anthropic models: ~3.3 characters per token - For other models: Uses LangChain's default estimation - Can be customized with a custom `token_counter` function ### Message Preservation The middleware intelligently preserves message context: - **Recent Messages**: Always kept intact based on `keep` configuration - **AI/Tool Pairs**: Never split - if a cutoff point falls within tool messages, the system adjusts to keep the entire AI + Tool message sequence together - **Summary Format**: Summary is injected as a HumanMessage with the format: ``` Here is a summary of the conversation to date: [Generated summary text] ``` ## Best Practices ### Choosing Trigger Thresholds 1. **Token-based triggers**: Recommended for most use cases - Set to 60-80% of your model's context window - Example: For 8K context, use 4000-6000 tokens 2. **Message-based triggers**: Useful for controlling conversation length - Good for applications with many short messages - Example: 50-100 messages depending on average message length 3. **Fraction-based triggers**: Ideal when using multiple models - Automatically adapts to each model's capacity - Example: 0.8 (80% of model's max input tokens) ### Choosing Retention Policy (`keep`) 1. **Message-based retention**: Best for most scenarios - Preserves natural conversation flow - Recommended: 15-25 messages 2. **Token-based retention**: Use when precise control is needed - Good for managing exact token budgets - Recommended: 2000-4000 tokens 3. **Fraction-based retention**: For multi-model setups - Automatically scales with model capacity - Recommended: 0.2-0.4 (20-40% of max input) ### Model Selection - **Recommended**: Use a lightweight, cost-effective model for summaries - Examples: `gpt-4o-mini`, `claude-haiku`, or equivalent - Summaries don't require the most powerful models - Significant cost savings on high-volume applications - **Default**: If `model_name` is `null`, uses the default model - May be more expensive but ensures consistency - Good for simple setups ### Optimization Tips 1. **Balance triggers**: Combine token and message triggers for robust handling ```yaml trigger: - type: tokens value: 4000 - type: messages value: 50 ``` 2. **Conservative retention**: Keep more messages initially, adjust based on performance ```yaml keep: type: messages value: 25 # Start higher, reduce if needed ``` 3. **Trim strategically**: Limit tokens sent to summarization model ```yaml trim_tokens_to_summarize: 4000 # Prevents expensive summarization calls ``` 4. **Monitor and iterate**: Track summary quality and adjust configuration ## Troubleshooting ### Summary Quality Issues **Problem**: Summaries losing important context **Solutions**: 1. Increase `keep` value to preserve more messages 2. Decrease trigger thresholds to summarize earlier 3. Customize `summary_prompt` to emphasize key information 4. Use a more capable model for summarization ### Performance Issues **Problem**: Summarization calls taking too long **Solutions**: 1. Use a faster model for summaries (e.g., `gpt-4o-mini`) 2. Reduce `trim_tokens_to_summarize` to send less context 3. Increase trigger thresholds to summarize less frequently ### Token Limit Errors **Problem**: Still hitting token limits despite summarization **Solutions**: 1. Lower trigger thresholds to summarize earlier 2. Reduce `keep` value to preserve fewer messages 3. Check if individual messages are very large 4. Consider using fraction-based triggers ## Implementation Details ### Code Structure - **Configuration**: `packages/harness/deerflow/config/summarization_config.py` - **Integration**: `packages/harness/deerflow/agents/lead_agent/agent.py` (`_create_summarization_middleware`) - **Middleware**: `packages/harness/deerflow/agents/middlewares/summarization_middleware.py` — `DeerFlowSummarizationMiddleware`, subclassing `langchain.agents.middleware.SummarizationMiddleware` but overriding compaction to be transient (`wrap_model_call`) instead of destructive (`before_model`) - **Tests**: `tests/test_summarization_middleware.py` ### Middleware Order Summarization runs after ThreadData and Sandbox initialization but before Title and Clarification: 1. ThreadDataMiddleware 2. SandboxMiddleware 3. **SummarizationMiddleware** ← Runs here 4. TitleMiddleware 5. ClarificationMiddleware ### State Management - Configuration is loaded once at startup - Summarization is **non-destructive**: the summary replaces older messages only in the transient model request (`wrap_model_call`), never in persisted state. The checkpointer therefore keeps the full original conversation - The per-thread summary cache lives in a **process-wide, thread-safe LRU** (`_GLOBAL_SUMMARY_CACHE`, bounded), **not** on the middleware instance. `make_lead_agent` rebuilds a fresh middleware every run, so an instance cache would be cold each turn and re-run a blocking summary LLM call on every turn of a long conversation; the module-level cache keyed by `thread_id` lets a summary survive across turns. It is a cost optimization only — a cold/stale cache simply re-summarizes, which is always correct ## Example Configurations ### Minimal Configuration ```yaml summarization: enabled: true trigger: type: tokens value: 4000 keep: type: messages value: 20 ``` ### Production Configuration ```yaml summarization: enabled: true model_name: gpt-4o-mini # Lightweight model for cost efficiency trigger: - type: tokens value: 6000 - type: messages value: 75 keep: type: messages value: 25 trim_tokens_to_summarize: 5000 ``` ### Multi-Model Configuration ```yaml summarization: enabled: true model_name: gpt-4o-mini trigger: type: fraction value: 0.7 # 70% of model's max input keep: type: fraction value: 0.3 # Keep 30% of max input trim_tokens_to_summarize: 4000 ``` ### Conservative Configuration (High Quality) ```yaml summarization: enabled: true model_name: gpt-4 # Use full model for high-quality summaries trigger: type: tokens value: 8000 keep: type: messages value: 40 # Keep more context trim_tokens_to_summarize: null # No trimming ``` ## References - [LangChain Summarization Middleware Documentation](https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/middleware/built-in#summarization) - [LangChain Source Code](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain)